Explainer

Why U.S. companies no longer have to report who owns them

A 2026 Treasury rule permanently killed a federal requirement that millions of companies disclose their owners, ending a fight that ran through Congress, the courts and two administrations.

Why U.S. companies no longer have to report who owns them — illustration

On August 11, 2026, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued a final rule permanently ending the requirement that U.S. companies and U.S. persons disclose their beneficial owners to the federal government. The Treasury Department dated the rule's effective date to August 14, 2026, when it was set for publication in the Federal Register.

The rule closes out a fight that began with the Corporate Transparency Act's passage in 2021, moved through federal courts in 2024, and ended with Treasury choosing not to enforce most of the law even before those court fights were resolved. A reporting requirement that FinCEN once expected to reach roughly 32.6 million companies will now never take effect for domestic businesses.

What the Corporate Transparency Act Required

Congress enacted the Corporate Transparency Act on January 1, 2021, as part of that year's defense authorization bill. The law directed FinCEN to build a registry of who actually owns and controls U.S. companies, aimed at curbing the use of anonymous shell companies for money laundering, sanctions evasion and terrorism financing.

FinCEN issued its implementing regulations on September 30, 2022. Under those rules, most corporations and LLCs — called "reporting companies" — had to report the identities of their beneficial owners, starting January 1, 2024.

Willful violations could carry both civil and criminal penalties. FinCEN's own estimate put the initial pool of reporting companies at 32.6 million.

How Courts and Treasury Unwound the Rule

Among several federal lawsuits challenging the law almost as soon as it took effect, two moved fastest through the courts. In National Small Business United v. Yellen, a federal district court in Alabama ruled the Corporate Transparency Act unconstitutional and blocked its enforcement against the plaintiffs; the government appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, which heard arguments on September 27, 2024.

A second case moved faster. On December 3, 2024, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas granted a nationwide preliminary injunction against the law in Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland. The U.S. Supreme Court stayed that injunction on January 23, 2025, but the reporting requirement remained blocked nationwide because of a separate nationwide suspension ordered in another case.

Treasury then acted on its own. On March 2, 2025, it announced it would not enforce the rule against domestic reporting companies or U.S. citizens, and would apply beneficial ownership reporting only to foreign companies. FinCEN followed with an interim final rule, effective March 26, 2025, that redefined "reporting company" to cover only entities formed abroad and registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction.

What the August 2026 Final Rule Locks In

The August 2026 rule makes that interim narrowing permanent. It eliminates beneficial ownership reporting for all U.S.-formed companies and U.S. persons, and confines the remaining obligation to foreign entities registered to do business in the United States — and only with respect to their foreign beneficial owners, not any U.S. person involved with them.

FinCEN estimates roughly 28,000 foreign entities remain subject to the requirement, of which about 13,000 had already filed reports by the end of 2025. U.S. persons who had already obtained a FinCEN identifier are not required to update that information, and foreign pooled investment vehicles registered in the U.S. no longer have to report on U.S. person beneficial owners.

FinCEN also said it will delete beneficial ownership information previously submitted by filers it reasonably believes are U.S. persons, since they are now exempt. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed the change as fulfilling a promise to cut paperwork "without compromising our national security."

A Dispute Over Enforcement, Not Just Paperwork

The rule has drawn sharp criticism from anti-money-laundering advocates and some prosecutors. Erica Hanichak, co-director of the FACT Coalition, said the rule "keeps the floodgates open" for criminals to launder money through U.S. shell and front companies. Nelson Bunn of the National District Attorneys Association said removing the requirement "endangers American families and communities."

FinCEN's own figures show that narrowing the law's coverage to foreign entities alone exempts more than 99% of the companies that would have qualified as reporting companies under its original 2022 definition.

The timing matters internationally. The United States is currently undergoing its fifth mutual evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force, the global standard-setter on anti-money-laundering rules, which lists beneficial ownership transparency as a priority. The U.S. was upgraded to "largely compliant" on that standard in 2024, a rating tied in part to the Corporate Transparency Act's implementation. FATF's evaluation report is expected to be published in fall 2026.

What Changes for Businesses Now

For domestic companies, the practical effect is that a filing obligation many had prepared for, and some had already completed before the 2024–2025 injunctions, is now permanently gone. There is no federal beneficial ownership report to file, update or correct, and no exposure to the civil or criminal penalties that once attached to it.

Foreign companies registered to do business in a U.S. state or tribal jurisdiction are the exception. They must still file beneficial ownership information about their foreign owners, update it within 30 days of a change, and — for new registrants — file within 30 days of their registration becoming effective.

FinCEN's plan to purge previously filed data belonging to U.S. persons means the registry that briefly existed for domestic filers will not remain on record. Whether that satisfies FATF evaluators, or draws further legislative attempts to restore broader reporting, remains an open question as the international review proceeds.

The Policy Desk

Editorial Staff

More from Policy